• Die Existenz eines “Google-Campus” in unserem Kreuzberger hätte die zügellose Gentrifizierung zwangsläufig beschleunigt, die den Einheimischen das Leben erschwert, die Mieten zwangsläufig steigen lässt, langfristige Bewohner und Unternehmen verdrängt. Verschiedene Projekte in anderen Teilen der Welt können ähnliche Auswirkungen haben und sehen glücklicherweise wachsende Widerstände durch mutige Netzwerke von Menschen!


Google [abgesagt?] Büro- und Startspekulationen in Kreuzberg

Google tried to open a 2500m² “campus” in Kreuzberg to attract, detect and buy profitable companies and ideas. Sold as a “community” project, in reality it aimed at attracting “entrepreneurs” who will increase Google’s profit.

This project would have turned the neighborhood into a large-scale laboratory for the deployment of their new invasive technologies. Instead of a nice friendly “campus” we saw a Google farm for harvesting Kreuzberg’s brains and talents, or a Google mine in which ideas and data would be extracted out of Berlin.

After two years of mobilization, in a diverse, decentralized and direct action-oriented fashion, Kreuzberg successfully managed to get the plan for a “Google campus” canceled. Or was it?

“Google Campus” light - Now with social whitewashing!

While canceling their “campus”, Google will still pay rent in the proejected site (Umspannwerk) and running costs for 5 years. Co-opted organisations, betterplace.org and Karuna, who previously received money from them, will be in the space in Google’s place to make them look like philanthropists. Google could decide to revive their “campus” project as the seat will be kept warm for them, in 1, 3, or 5 years.

To ensure that the business relationship between Google and Karuna also pays off, Karuna publishes the homeless newspaper “Karuna Kompass”. In contrast to its predecessor “Strassenfeger”, where people without residence were encouraged to write themselves, this new paper is purely an advertising and propaganda magazine. In the current issue #5 this can be recognized by the design alone, for which the well-known Google colors were used. But also contentwise the first pages are used by Karuna boss Jörg Richert to discredit the protest of the last 2 years against the Google Campus.

It is especially bitter to see that homeless people are now walking around the city distributing a publication that contains content opposing their own interests. In short, Google indirectly uses homeless people for corporate propaganda. How perfidious and disgraceful is that?

Betterplace.org is leading the way when it comes to making a profit out of social commitment. Betterplace’s business model is to show companies how they can improve their image fast and easy with the proximity to social projects. As is so often the case, quality and content are not important, because the “social projects” are not verified. It is only a matter of preserving appearances. Betterplace is supported by gut.org, a non-profit stock corporation (!) with connections to Springer, Bertelsmann, PayPal, Google…, and is funded by private entities including Sparkasse.

This whitewashing is unacceptable and must be denounced!


San Francisco

In San Francisco haben die besserverdienenden Google Mitarbeiter ihr eigenes Busnetz. Innerhalb kürzester Zeit wurde die Stadt zur teuersten der Welt.


Google’s sister company Sidewalk Labs is building in Toronto a “Google city” out of an empty district, a dystopian “smart city” project where the urban environment surveils everyone all the time.

Rennes, etc.

San Jose